|
anita84love
|
Hello my Dear.
Hello my Dear.
My name is Anita, i saw your profile today at (www.cheatsguru.com). and became interested
in you, i will also like to know you the more, and i want you to send an email to my email
address so i can send you my picture for you to know whom i am. Here is my email address
(anita84love77@yahoo.com). I believe we can move from here. (Remember the distance or
colour does not matter but love matters alot in life) Thanks and remain bless,
Anita
(anita84love77@yahoo.com)
Posted: nov 26, 2010 4:07 pm
|
platinummast er8
|
Go away!
Posted: nov 26, 2010 4:10 pm | edited by Author nov 26, 2010 4:10 pm
|
MATA
|
Lol
Posted: nov 26, 2010 4:34 pm
|
Custard
|
Posted: nov 26, 2010 6:16 pm
|
|
Syntax_Error
|
I will report you!
Who are you going to report for what? Your threats to report a bot are not going to be
effective at all and you're just making yourself look dumb.
Posted: nov 26, 2010 7:43 pm
|
Custard
|
Syntax_Error, honestly
Just because they would post the same thing 27 times doesn't really make the a bot now
does it? In fact using a bot just for that would be absurd. And on topic, reporting the
account could quite easily get it blocked. You think bots are invulnerable to the admins
or something?
Posted: nov 26, 2010 8:25 pm
|
|
Syntax_Error
|
It would be easy to assume that it's a bot.
Using a bot for that would be extremely appropriate, actually. Your replies to try to
prove me wrong and starting unnecessary arguments are getting worse and worse as far as
even starting an argument or tying to prove me wrong. If I recall a good majority of users
on the site got PM's from some Kennedy person. I doubt they would do this manually,
scripting a bot would be extremely easy to do and I doubt there would be enough turnout to
do this manually. Also, It's getting more and more apparent that you don't know what
you're talking about but rather spewing big words to try to make yourself sound better.
Posted: nov 26, 2010 9:12 pm
|
Custard
|
It would be easy to assume it's YOUR bot, considering how much you seem to know bout it.
Come back and tell me my attempts to prove you wrong are getting bad AFTER you can come up
with a reply showing that I didn't just prove you wrong about how reporting that account
would being ineffective! So silly of you.
Also found this amusing: "If I recall a good majority of users on the site got PM's from some Kennedy person."
Yeah, I was here, I think it was about.. um.. three user that reported getting that.
In fact all your arguments above are assumptions and "doubts"(just read it again lol), and
you still care to accuse me of not knowing what I'm talking about. That just slaps me on
the knee.
Posted: nov 26, 2010 9:42 pm
|
|
Syntax_Error
|
Three users "reported" getting that
I know a lot more users got that. Way more than "three" reported it, and who knows how
many more people who don't visit CG Community got it as well. It would be silly to say
that only people who happened to "report" it on CG Community are the only ones that got
it. Now you're desperately backing up your arguments without thinking them through. Next
thing we know you'll be spewing personal insults.
Posted: nov 26, 2010 10:10 pm | edited by Author nov 26, 2010 10:21 pm
|
Custard
|
Oh
So care to tell me why it's silly to assume that only a few people got the message when
only a few bothered to say anything about it? Or how you know a lot more users got it?
It's rather ironic; first you accuse me of not knowing what I'm talking about, now you say
I'm desperate and not thinking through my responses. Yet I'm countering your points with
legit answers that you're choosing not to reply to. Why don't you, oh I don't know, stop
fooling yourself and defend your first post or something? You're obviously a poor judge of
character too, if you think I'd use un-based personal insults to try to make any sort of
point.
Posted: nov 26, 2010 10:31 pm
|
|
Syntax_Error
|
oh sorry
Obviously stating that exactly three people got the message is more logical, my bad.
brb banging head on desk on my print out picture that you nicely advised me to do
Posted: nov 26, 2010 11:00 pm | edited by Author nov 26, 2010 11:00 pm
|
Custard
|
I said "exactly"?
Hm, nop, it was in the context of an assumption and talking about the number of people
that reported getting the message, not all the people that got it! Actually it was exactly
4 people: Aldermar, WaddleDee777, Peashooter765, and PkmnTrainerNathan. You okay there?
Posted: nov 26, 2010 11:13 pm | edited by Author nov 26, 2010 11:17 pm
|
|
Syntax_Error
|
wow
Why do you always want to argue with me for some reason? Every post/thread I make will
probably lead to you starting an argument and me playing along because I want to prove you
wrong. There aren't going to be any questions without us arguing if it keeps up like this.
Posted: nov 27, 2010 12:13 am
|
Custard
|
Probably
I just find it amusing to prove someone with such a supercilious attitude wrong. I don't
really care at all about bots and whatnot.
Posted: nov 27, 2010 12:26 am
|
platinummast er8
|
Syntax_Error
You remind me of an unregi freak I once met.
Posted: nov 27, 2010 3:36 am | edited by Author nov 27, 2010 3:36 am
|
Peashooter76 5
|
Congratulations
i be a 100 user in CG in points hall of fame.
Posted: nov 27, 2010 6:41 am
|
Love95Legend z
|
Anita is annoying me now.
Posted: nov 27, 2010 12:20 pm
|