He means those impersonators have been inactive for many months, even the people they are
impersonating have been generally inactive for quite some time.

In other words: Nobody cares, it's not a problem, and you should think a bit more about
issues before you raise them here. Cheatsguru community has a checkered and dramatic past,
if we start pulling out obsolete problems from our history and trying to fix them then not
only will the task be redundant, it will also be hindering the administration as the try
to work on more important things.

But what about those impersonators that 5-Year-Old got banned? They may have been inactive
but they are still impersonators and therefore, they deserve to be banned. Cos what if
Zin'ya thinks the users are an alternative account of whom they are impersonating and ends
up banning them? But, yet, that's not the point. Impersonating is wrong cos if they
impersonate someone, then they may get lots of benifets and the other users won't. But,
again, I'm missing the point. Active or not, impersonators need to get banned.

When 5-Year-Old got some impersonators banned it was months ago, when there was an
impersonator crisis going on. For all we know those accounts you found could belong to
some of the original users who they represent, quite simply: it's not a crime to have a
similar username. Since they haven't been around for so long or been doing any actual
impersonating, why is this even a problem?

Really